Megyn Kelly Shreds Laura Ingraham For ‘Moving On’ From Epstein Files
Megyn Kelly is criticizing MAGA media figures such as Laura Ingraham for distancing themselves from the Jeffrey Epstein narrative now that it poses discomfort for Donald Trump.
During her podcast, Kelly conveyed her astonishment at Ingraham’s sudden quietness, especially after years of openly denouncing Epstein.
“We now have certain MAGA influencers, evidently following the White House’s lead, declaring, ‘Alright, I’m finished,’” Kelly remarked.
She specifically pointed out Ingraham for stating she would be “moving on” from the subject.
“She was involved in it,” Kelly continued.
“I have a fondness for Laura, but she unequivocally stood there and fueled this fire.”
Kelly and Ingraham collaborated at Fox News from 2007 until 2017, after which Kelly transitioned to NBC and subsequently established her own independent platform.
On Tuesday’s episode of “The Ingraham Angle,” Ingraham did not mention Epstein at all. The only reference to him was made in passing by a guest during a discussion about Sen. Adam Schiff. Ingraham’s silence reflected Fox’s overall reluctance to address the Epstein case — a position that aligns with President Donald Trump’s viewpoint.
On Wednesday, Trump lashed out at those who continue to question the Epstein narrative, labeling them as “weaklings” who have “fallen for this nonsense, hook, line, and sinker.”
In contrast, Kelly is positioning herself as a representative for MAGA supporters who are frustrated with the DOJ’s choice to close the case and dismiss conspiracy allegations related to Epstein.
She received enthusiastic applause at Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA event when she inquired if the audience still cared about the story. Kelly also criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi, describing her management of the case as “incompetence.”
She subsequently directed her criticism towards Kirk for stating he was “moving on” from Epstein “for the time being,” and played a clip of his comments.
“Let us not deceive ourselves into thinking that some of the president’s staunchest supporters are not deeply interested in Epstein. They certainly are,” Kelly remarked.
“Nevertheless, certain media figures allow their allegiance to the president to overshadow their journalistic responsibilities.”
Kirk replied, asserting that his remarks were taken “out of context” and insisted that he still intends to discuss Epstein — just not as the sole focus.
Kelly emphasized her determination to stand firm.
She stated that journalists like herself have a responsibility to persist in questioning, regardless of which administration is in power.
“I am merely stating that journalists — individuals like me who identify as journalists — have an obligation not to accept information at face value,” Kelly explained.
“You must scrutinize the details. That is your duty. You should approach all narratives and everything presented to you by an administration official, whether you like them, admire them, respect them, or trust them, with a significant amount of skepticism.”
Fox News anchor Bret Baier recognized the increasing public discontent regarding President Trump’s efforts to move beyond Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking scandal.
Baier commenced “Special Report” by acknowledging Trump’s achievements in border security and trade negotiations but noted that the Epstein case continues to overshadow political discourse.
“The story does not simply fade away,” Baier remarked, transitioning into a news segment on the latest developments regarding Epstein.
“President Trump has stated that his attorney general should disclose any documents she deems credible related to the late businessman and convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein,” Baier reported at the beginning of his program.
“This is his most recent statement in the continuing controversy that has divided numerous supporters of the president,” he continued, emphasizing that there remains a faction of Trump supporters who are unwilling to allow this narrative to fade away.
Baier subsequently introduced correspondent David Spunt, stating, “This narrative will not simply disappear here.”
In the meantime, the Justice Department has informed a federal court that it is currently reviewing documents associated with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as part of a Freedom of Information Act case initiated by Judicial Watch.